Building with Gemini Embedding 2: Agentic Multimodal RAG
Harness Gemini Embedding 2 to create sophisticated agentic multimodal RAG systems for advanced AI applications.

So, you’ve trained your massive LLM, and now you need to make it yours. You’re looking for that killer fine-tuning solution that doesn’t break the bank or demand a supercomputer cluster. Well, Google’s MaxText just made a significant play with its introduction of Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) capabilities, specifically targeting single-host TPU configurations like v5p-8 and v6e-8. This move aims to democratize advanced LLM customization, leveraging the power of JAX and the Tunix library for high-performance post-training.
The true value of an LLM often lies in its ability to be specialized. Post-training, particularly SFT, allows models to adapt to specific tasks, datasets, and desired behaviors. However, achieving this efficiently, especially on specialized hardware like TPUs, has historically been a complex undertaking. The challenge is to balance raw performance, cost-effectiveness, and ease of integration for practitioners. MaxText’s latest enhancements directly address this by bringing robust SFT and RL to more accessible, single-host TPU setups.
MaxText’s expansion into post-training is built upon a robust stack, with the Tunix library acting as a central orchestrator for SFT and RL. It offers native support for Hugging Face datasets, a significant boon for the wider AI community, and allows fine-tuning of existing MaxText models or Hugging Face checkpoints, including popular ones like Gemma 3.
Launching an SFT run is straightforward:
python3 -m maxtext.trainers.post_train.sft.train_sft \
--model=<your_model_config> \
--checkpoint=<path_to_your_checkpoint> \
--run_name=<your_run_name> \
--output_dir=<your_output_directory>
The underlying Tunix library is where the magic happens. It’s a JAX-based solution designed for flexibility and performance, supporting not just SFT and RL (including GRPO and GSPO) but also Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods like LoRA and QLoRA. Integration with Qwix for quantization further streamlines the process of creating efficient, deployable models. The entire MaxText ecosystem, comprising Flax (NNX), Optax, Orbax, Grain, Qwix, and Tunix, is engineered for high Model FLOPs Utilization (MFU) and strong performance per dollar, even extending to NVIDIA GPUs via JAX.
While MaxText champions high performance and efficiency on Google Cloud TPUs, it’s not without its historical context. Earlier sentiment suggested a steep learning curve and “needless layers of abstraction,” leading some practitioners to explore alternatives like EasyLM and Levanter. EasyLM offered simplicity but lacked robust sharding, while Levanter was less proven. Tunix’s “white-box” design and integration with vLLM for RL inference aim to address these past criticisms by offering more transparency and flexibility. However, the complexity of the MaxText stack remains a consideration.
MaxText’s new SFT and RL capabilities are a powerful addition for those deeply invested in the JAX and TPU ecosystem. The ability to fine-tune on single-host TPUs is a welcome accessibility improvement, and the performance gains are undeniable when configured correctly. However, let’s be clear: this is not a plug-and-play solution for the faint of heart.
Achieving optimal TPU performance necessitates a granular understanding of hardware architecture. To truly unlock the Matrix Multiply Unit (MXU), model dimensions like emb_dim and mlp_dim must be aligned as multiples of 256 (for Trillium/Ironwood) or 128 (for older TPUs). Deviating from this can halve efficiency – a critical point for cost-conscious projects. If your priority is codebase simplicity and a gentler learning curve, or if the inherent complexity of advanced abstraction layers is a significant deterrent, you might find yourself struggling.
Honest verdict: MaxText offers a potent, highly optimized path for LLM post-training on Google Cloud TPUs, especially with its recent SFT additions. For users committed to the JAX ecosystem and willing to dive deep into its intricacies, the performance and cost benefits are substantial. However, be prepared for a demanding technical investment. This is a tool for those who want to wring every last drop of performance out of their hardware, not for those seeking a quick and easy fine-tuning script.