<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Database Design on The Coders Blog</title><link>https://thecodersblog.com/tag/database-design/</link><description>Recent content in Database Design on The Coders Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thecodersblog.com/tag/database-design/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Beyond Filesystems: Why Your Private GitHub Should Run on Postgres [2026]</title><link>https://thecodersblog.com/my-private-github-on-postgres-2026/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:09:51 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecodersblog.com/my-private-github-on-postgres-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For too long, the bedrock of our version control—Git itself—has been inextricably linked to the filesystem. But what if we told you that for your private GitHub instance, this isn&amp;rsquo;t just an outdated constraint, but a fundamental barrier to the control and insight your sophisticated workflows demand?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-filesystems-shackles-why-git-needs-a-new-home"&gt;The Filesystem&amp;rsquo;s Shackles: Why Git Needs a New Home&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Git, in its conventional design, treats content-addressable data as files on disk. These files reference each other via &lt;strong&gt;SHA-1 hashes&lt;/strong&gt;, forming a directed acyclic graph that represents your project&amp;rsquo;s history. This model has served us incredibly well for decades, providing robust, distributed version control.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>