<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>DSL on The Coders Blog</title><link>https://thecodersblog.com/tag/dsl/</link><description>Recent content in DSL on The Coders Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 03:41:04 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thecodersblog.com/tag/dsl/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Rust Meets Lisp: A Novel Programming Language Experiment</title><link>https://thecodersblog.com/rust-inspired-lisp-dialect-rust-but-lisp-2026/</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 03:41:04 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecodersblog.com/rust-inspired-lisp-dialect-rust-but-lisp-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The relentless march of programming language innovation often finds its most fertile ground at the intersection of seemingly disparate paradigms. We&amp;rsquo;ve seen the rise of functional programming influencing imperative languages, and now, a fascinating experiment emerges: &lt;strong&gt;&amp;ldquo;Rust but Lisp&amp;rdquo; (&lt;code&gt;rlisp&lt;/code&gt;)&lt;/strong&gt;. This project boldly attempts to graft the rigorous safety guarantees and performance of Rust onto the elegant, symbolic s-expression syntax of Lisp. It&amp;rsquo;s a compelling proposition for anyone intrigued by the syntactic flexibility of Lisp and the unparalleled robustness of Rust, especially for those who have wrestled with Rust&amp;rsquo;s macros or yearn for a more interactive development experience without sacrificing compile-time safety.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>