<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>VLLM on The Coders Blog</title><link>https://thecodersblog.com/tag/vllm/</link><description>Recent content in VLLM on The Coders Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 08:31:08 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thecodersblog.com/tag/vllm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>vLLM V0 to V1: Prioritizing Correctness in RL for LLMs</title><link>https://thecodersblog.com/vllm-v0-to-v1-correctness-before-corrections-in-rl-2026/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 08:31:08 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecodersblog.com/vllm-v0-to-v1-correctness-before-corrections-in-rl-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The pursuit of more capable and reliable Large Language Models (LLMs) has driven a relentless pace of innovation in their training and deployment infrastructure. Among the most exciting advancements is the integration of Reinforcement Learning (RL) to fine-tune LLMs, moving beyond simple supervised learning to imbue them with nuanced behaviors, ethical alignment, and sophisticated reasoning abilities. However, the journey from a functional inference engine to a robust RL training environment is fraught with peril. This is precisely where the recent evolution of vLLM, from its V0 to V1 architecture, offers a critical lesson: correctness in the fundamental mechanics of inference must precede algorithmic &amp;ldquo;corrections&amp;rdquo; in RL, especially when dealing with the sensitive calculations that underpin policy updates.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>